It makes a lot of sense to me, and I think it would be a good rule of thumb to implement for any being for which you have stewardship, whether it is your own minor child or a member of a different species, especially if that species is threatened or endangered.
When we came to adopt Bow, Connor was there to show us how to interact with an older chimp |
The breeders know this. That's why they don't allow you to adopt a chimpanzee just based on your ability to bond with a helpless little baby. They want to know that you won't bail out when the going gets tougher. Before I adopted Bow, I was introduced through the glass to some adult male chimpanzees, who hurled themselves at me and made a big point of trying to scare me. When I was first allowed to hold Bow, unbeknownst to me, an eight year old male by the name of Connor was allowed to come into the room to check me and my daughter out. My eyes were fixed on Bow, so that I did not even notice when Connor first came on the scene. But clearly he was there to test us.
Connor was very interested in Sword. He liked her shoes and the decorations in her hair. He offered to hold her hand and walked with her all around the room, and he took off her shoes, and played with her hair. He was very gentle, though, and she did not mind. When asked to give back the shoes, Connor reluctantly did so.
Later Connor was given some baby food to eat with a spoon. Sword even got to feed him some.
We thought we were going there to see the baby we were going to adopt. But there was no question that we would like Bow and that he would like us. The real question was, would we be a good family for Bow when he was no longer so small and helpless. Would we be able to cope with a bigger chimpanzee, like Connor. Or an even bigger one, like the adult males behind the glass.
A Closeup of Bow taken yesterday |
It's true that now Bow's mobility and options are more restricted than they were when he was little and able to play outside the pens and travel with us to distant states, like New Hampshire.
One criticism that is leveled at people who raise chimpanzees is that after a certain age the freedom that the chimps enjoy as youngsters is curtailed. Knowing that this will happen, people ask, would it not be better not to have adopted the chimp in the first place? Would it not be better to keep them with their own kind?
No, it would not be better. If Bow had been kept with his own kind his entire life, he would have been caged his entire life. He wasn't born free. He was born right here in Missouri. Isn't it better that he had his freedom for as long as he possibly could, under our current social restrictions? And if Bow has children of his own, which I hope that he will someday, would it not be better that they have freedom to roam for as long as they possibly can?
They say we should think about solutions which are sustainable. The breeder model is sustainable, because the funding for it comes from people who really want chimpanzees. The sanctuary model is not sustainable, because the funding for it comes from people who have no real interest in chimpanzees and who are largely committed to ending the existence of chimpanzees outside the continent of Africa.
I don't see my role in Bow's life ending with his maturation, though I recognize that as a child matures, the relationship has to change. With our human children, as well, we have to learn to let go and give them more space, though we never stop caring. The big reward for allowing your children to grow up, I am told by people who have been through this, is that eventually there are grandchildren!
There is no shame in liking babies of every kind. It is only wrong to try to keep your children babies forever! We don't love our children less because we have that special place in our heart for the next generation that comes after. One of the reasons it is important not to infantilize your child or your non-human companion is that an eternal infancy is a biological dead end.
There is a place for grandmothers in the scheme of things. Grandmothers see past the needs of a single generation. They think about ten generations into the future. I consider myself a grandmother in training.
Excellent read, Aya! Yes, you are definitely a "grandmother in training", both for Bow's and for Sword's future children. What fun! Yes, we have to plan way ahead. I did have to grieve when my son left home, got married, had children of his own. My influence pretty much ended. I'm sure I'm being respectfully "heard", but have little influence over him as an adult now. However, the grandchildren that I have are a whole different story! They think their Grandma rocks!
ReplyDeleteEnjoyed the video of Sword & Bow too. And yes, I noticed too that he didn't seem comfortable around the water. Is that because chimps lack any body fat and could drown?
Hi, Kathy, I bet you are a very cool grandma! I aspire to be at least half as cool, when my turn comes.
DeleteYes, the lack of body fat is the thing that makes chimpanzees unable to float. It's for this reason that an island surrounded by a deep body of water is better than any fence as a territorial boundary for chimpanzees.
I am always in awe of your blog articles when reading them, just as I am with this one. I think it's splendid the breeders tested you with the presence of an older, more protective, chimpanzee. And it's awesome that you were all a perfect fit for one another. Not to worry, you'll make a great grandma!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Ruth!
Delete